Saturday, November 26, 2016

CONSTANTINE’s the Reason for the Season

My Cat Tig acting out "A Long Winter's Nap...."

“Jesus is the reason for the season”(?)

As followers of Jesus we want the surrounding world, as they party hardy and trim their trees and buy/give gifts, to remember and hopefully comprehend that Jesus is the actual “reason for the season.”  To reinforce this, someone came up with this engaging but somewhat condescending invective as a handy reminder that Christmas is still, after all, about Christ.  There is however enough historical Grinch in me, upon viewing this or hearing someone intone it, to respond with the question, “Is he indeed?” Now before working up a righteous anger, sharing this and consigning me to the netherworld, consider the following about Christmas as it has come down to us.

As an observance (AKA holiday), Christmas was not really even on the church’s radar until around the 3rd century.  Easter was (is!) the high point in the Christian calendar as the early church saw the resurrection as the primary reason for celebration.  After all it was this climactic event of Jesus’ sojourn that made possible the forgiveness of sin and peace with God. 

The shift came when, in 313 AD, Emperors Constantine and Licinius signed the Edict of Milan granting toleration for religions in the empire.  The empire’s non-interference with religious groups like those of “The Way” was a crucial turning point in the life of the church, both for better and for worse.  This edict ended organized persecution of the church and believers could, for the most part, breath a collective sigh of relief.  Constantine, the church’s newfound friend, and eventually a believer, (though waiting to be baptised until he was on his deathbed), began to have an influence in the church that brought about changes that impacted the way the church, and later, the world would adapt the Christmas narrative, as an excuse for perhaps much more than was intended.

Constantine introduced pagan traditions and “appended” them to a Christian nativity observance.  Whether he simply wanted to make it easier for pagans to convert to Christianity, or as a means of unifying his empire, the emperor capitalized on other popular celebrations and sought to merge them into a single event.  Saturnalia, a pagan festival running from December 17 through the 24th was coupled with a festival observing the birth of the Mithras, the Persian god of light.  The latter ran from December 25 through January 1.  From its outset, the Christmas celebration was a holiday (or holy day), when gifts were exchanged, families and friends gathered to feast, and a birth was celebrated; just like in the Roman and Persian festivities. Though the actual date of Christ’s birth was never specified, this did not prevent Pope Julius I from proclaiming it to be December 25th.  The first mention of December 25 as being the date of Jesus' birth is found in an early Roman calendar from A.D. 336. The fact that the celebration of Saturnalia, a pagan Roman holiday, fell at the same time of year should not be lost on the reader.  It was a not so subtle attempt to fuse the nativity observance  to other pagan celebrations.

Of Saturnalia it is said that:

Saturnalia was a hedonistic time, when food and drink were plentiful and the normal Roman social order was turned upside down. For a month, slaves would become masters. Peasants were in command of the city. Business and schools were closed so that everyone could join in the fun.

Obviously, not all of these traditions continued to present day but you can see why many who wanted to retain their traditions and also claim the Christian faith as their own would have welcomed this merging of observances.

Over the centuries, Christmas observance and traditions have increased exponentially. Though it was been decried by colonial Puritans as unscriptural, it continued to be reshaped into to what it has become now; a religious observance tacked onto an ever expanding secular and commercial phenomenon.  The glorification of the day after Thanksgiving as “Black Friday” is a prime example of the on going tweaking of what this season has become.  Just think of it; people leaving their homes, as early as Thanksgiving afternoon to pick up a good buy on sale item.  In its fashion, Black Friday plays the same role as Mardi Gras does to Ash Wednesday; a voracious commercial festival held just prior to the solemn holiday into which Christmas has evolved.

The emergence of Christmas as one of THE major observances of the church was accelerated by the “well-meaning” actions of Constantine and it was apparently accepted, if not welcomed, by the grateful church of his day. By adopting/adapting these contrasting and conflicting visions, the early church began to morph into something very different from what it had been.

So, what of this idea that “Jesus is the Reason for the Season”? As believers we certainly want to make sure that people know that Christmas is about Jesus don’t we?  Shouldn’t we strive to “Keep Christ in Christmas”?  The answer to these questions is an emphatic yes but must we at the same time connect Jesus with the season for what it has become.  What it has become is increasingly less about Jesus and more about the pluralistic society in which we live. Even the  Jesus part of Christmas has been diminished.  Christmas parties have become holiday get-togethers.  Christmas vacation is now winter vacation. Santa is the one to whom people want to talk.


Yes, I know.  This might be viewed as nit picking by some but the question remains; Is Jesus REALLY the reason for what this “season” has become?  Perhaps a new adage is needed; Constantine is the reason for the season.  Jesus’ nativity was just a convenient excuse.